|
|
The
Bolshoi Ballet tour in London
|
| The
participants of the tour are sharing their summer impressions
on their London tour. |
| Åkaterina
Shipulina |
I must say that’s my first
visit to London, I saw it for the first time in my life and
simply fell in love with this city! Now my wish is to go there
once again as a tourist and not to be bound to any theatre
or performances, and be able to see everything, all the sites,
without haste, to take my time... On the London stage I participated
in three performances: danced the Emperess of dryads and Êitry
in " Don Quixote ", Polish Bride and Îdette-Odile
in " Swan Lake ", the Congo River in " the
Daughter of Pharaoh ". Unlike the majority of our actors
who were to dance practically every evening I was lucky to
have a holiday of its kind during our London tour just in
the middle of the intense and tough schedule: the repertoire
was arranged in such a way that " Romeo and Juliet "
and "Spartacus" followed each other with no break.
I did not dance these performances and could afford a walk
around London.
Our actors, certainly, did their best
to see the city, too, but unfortunately they were more occupied
than me and could do it in short breaks between rehearsals
and performances. Buckingham Palace, Windsor Castle and the
Tower impressed me best of all. It was eye opening to walk
around the city! And what’s more, we got an excellent guide:
he sounded really fascinating when telling it all, that he
made us all ears. There is no book to read about it! All of
us, we walked around the city a lot, admired the streets,
visited its parks and squares...
The building of Covent-Garden theatre,
certainly, didn’t seem so impressive to us as Grand Opera.
The building of Parisian Opera is huge, beautiful, amazing
with its magnificence, splendour, scale, while Covent-Garden
is plain-looking and modest, but inside the theatre is surprisingly
convenient, equipped with every possible modern gadget.
The performances were a great success,
with all of them sold out. And there was no end to applauses.
Any failure is absolutely out of the question! " Don
Quixote " and " Swan Lake ", " The Daughter
of Pharaoh " and " Spartacus " - everything
was accepted enthusiastically, especially after " Romeo
and Juliet ". To tell the truth, I didn’t see "Romeo",
but I know that this very ballet caused most controversy.
Both the spectators’ response and the press coverage differed
greatly. The English were telling us more than once that it’s
beyond them to understand why the notorious Declan Donnellan
was invited to do the ballet and why this version of “Romeo
and Juliet” was brought to London at all, while old well-established
version by the Leonid Lavrovsky had been awaited. Russian
classics of the 1950-s with unforgettable Galina Ulanova starring.
The English felt nostalgic about it: they expected this version
to arrive, but instead they had to see something absolutely
different and naturally felt disappointed. As to the new version
of "Romeo", it was not interesting enough to impress
them...
And in general all the English are very
benevolent and friendly. They waited for us to say something
nice at the theatre after each performance, congratulated
us, expressed their delight, asked for autographs. There were
surprisingly many Russian-speaking people among them. Obviously,
emigrants living in London. It was extremely pleasant to find
ourselves for a while among Russians in London. One of the
spectators even presented me with a photo of myself taken
by him at Kishinev Festival, where I once danced. Certainly,
it was fun to meet this man in London, a man, who had seen
and remembered me dancing before... |
|
Denis Medvedev |
I happened to visit London
five years ago exactly, together with the Bolshoi Ballet troupe.
That time my impressions of the city were much stronger. I
managed to visit quite a number of museums, to see both the
Òower and St. Paul’s Cathedral with its 600-step staircase,
I admired Madam Òussaud’s Museum and had a rest on the historical
Trafalgar Square... This time I was much more busy, did far
more performances so I found my working schedule so tough,
that I could hardly find enough time to see anything. Nevertheless,
I couldn’t help trying a ride on their new huge Megawheel
erected on the bank of the Thames to enjoy the wonderful view
of London from there. This attraction wheel was constructed
in 2000 to honour the Millennium and it is rightfully considered
one of the Wonders of Great Britain. In my scarce free moments
I simply walked about London parks, did some sunbathing in
St. James’ Park, one of the city’s most beautiful. And as
a general impression I find that the city hasn’t changed during
the past five years: Londoners are surprisingly lovely, cheerful,
smiling... City life in summer is in full swing - London attracts
tourists from all over the world, the streets are crowded
which naturally makes the prices sky-rocket.
This time the performances were held
on the premises of Covent Garden, which had been under repairs
five years ago. The theatre has nice and light rehearsal rooms,
cleverly equipped with all sorts of electronics, with movable
constructions which bare the scenery placed on them in advance,
and then just in time the scenery passes onto the stage. There
are also enormous underground premises at its service, where
all the scenery is kept orderly and handy.
I danced in every performance except
for " Don Quixote ". There was no performance that
wasn’t sold out. Covent Garden was packed to capacity, with
Bolshoi Ballet theatre-lovers from Japan, Mexico, USA being
frequent guests. Many Russians who live in London and saw
us in 1999, came to see us again. When at night we were leaving
the theatre, there were always lots of fans, admirers and
just friends of ours waiting for us. They asked for autographs,
and it was very pleasant. All our performances were a great
success, though " Swan Lake” seemed to have been accepted
least enthusiastically if compared with the other ballets.
At "Spartacus", "Romeo and Juliet", "The
Daughter of Pharaoh", "Don Quixote" the audience
applauded on their feet in the finale and the applause was
thunderous and long. The opening night of " Romeo and
Juliet " is worth a separate remark. The first cast danced
their best but they did not win a single ripple of applause.
When Act I was over and the curtain was closed, a long pause
was hanging in the air. We were at a loss as to what that
pause may mean. None of us was quite sure whether there would
be any at all. Declan Donellann, frightened and discouraged,
turned up in the wings, his face red with anxiety, he did
not even try to hide his emotions.
A bit later there was some polite applause
heard, but this pause made us anxious and nervous... And after
Act 2 the audience burst into tremendous applause! Donellann
beaming all over came out to bow together with the dancers
and flew about the stage like a butterfly. The public were
throwing flowers onto the stage, which is somewhat unusual
for prudish, economizing and reserved British people. Many
of them jumped to their feet and there was a long standing
ovation which our “Romeo” had never heard in Moscow. There
were countless curtain calls. Our ballet had never seen such
a great appreciation by the audience at home! On the third
and fourth nights of " Romeo and Juliet " with the
second cast the applause was a bit less generous. To tell
the truth, the third performance was a matinee and as a rule
all the tour matinee performances were not so much applauded
as the evening ones, even “ Spartacus’ which was considered
to enjoy the most success.
After " Romeo & Juliet "
we had to hear our spectators asking: " What for have
you brought this performance here? " Truly speaking,
the questions puzzled us not a little, as the choice was neither
ours nor that of the Bolshoi management, actually it was up
to the British party to make the choice. On our part, we only
danced what was offered and tried to do the utmost. Certainly,
the opinions concerning "Romeo" divided, but having
seen it many people said they would never forget it. The majority
of the spectators got a strongest shock from the modern version,
we saw many people in the auditorium crying when the curtain
closed. Such a tremendous impression it made. We knew that
a few most wealthy Londoners as well as some theatre and cinema
stars were present in the hall. They arrived to see "
Romeo and Juliet ". Among them the well-known actor Joseph
Faints, the title role performer in the film " Shakespear
in love ". As we were later told the actor was very much
impressed by our dancers’ perfect impersonating of Shakespear’s
characters, both their dancing and acting. The English theatrical
world really respect and love Donnellan. Certainly, the negative
reviews in the newspapers upset him very much, it was beyond
him to understand what was wrong with the ballet for critics
if there were no faults found with it by the audience?! We
hear that on Moscow TV "Romeo and Juliet" was said
to have met boos and hisses from the London public.
We didn’t see a single “boo” when bowing!
Where this information came from, I wonder, and was so quickly
picked up by all the Mass Media!
After the run Declan Donnellan invited
the participants of the production to his villa situated on
a most beautiful hill within a 20 minute-drive from the centre
of London, which he shares with the artist Nickolas Ormerod.
Both "Don Quixote" and "Pharoah's
Daughter", nicely placed at the beginning and end of
season.
"Pharaoh’s Daughter" was received
very warmly too. Pierre Lacotte came to see it and was pleased
with the performance. In all the four "Pharaoh"
performances I danced Ñlassical Variation in Pas d’acion;
then the central pas de trois of shepherds in all the Spartacuses,
the part of Jester in " Swan Lake " and two times
I appeared as Tybalt in "Romeo & Juliet". But
there were practically no free evenings in my tour schedule
because I was a reserve for the other productions and had
to stay in the theatre almost all the evenings. John Neumeier
came to see us in London both at rehearsals and performances,
sitting and selecting soloists for his work " Summer
Night Dream ", which he is going to bring to the Bolshoi
this season. On the closing of the tour Lillian Hohauser,
organizer of the tour, arranged a reception in the hotel for
the whole troupe. She was happy and pleased with the tour’s
results, she said she was going to invite the Bolshoi ballet
once again in two years time at least to give a few concerts.
Of our soloists Sergei Filin saw the
greatest success, of the ballerinas it was Masha Alexandrova,
the English audience especially appreciated her dancing Àspichy
in " Pharaoh’s Daughter ". Svetlana Zakharova won
well-earned attention of the British public as well. In "
Spartacus" Yura Klevtsov was most impressive and strong,
while Dima Gudanov won the public in " Swan Lake ".
So on the whole this tour was a great
success though an awfully hard one: a few actors got traumas
right at the beginning of season.
For the dancers the season appeared to
be physically exhausting for another reason as well, that
was the timing of the tour. It was scheduled to start in the
middle of summer, shortly after the season in the Bolshoi
was over, and the dancers practically had no time to recover
from it. And after the tour again we have very little time
to get rested before the upcoming season starts. Those three
working weeks in London have eaten up too much of our energy. |
Denis
Savin |
| You know, that was my
first visit to London, I saw it for the first time in my life
and I must say I got greatly impressed! As a matter of fact,
there, in London, I had my first tour abroad with the Bolshoi
ballet, without taking into account the one to Paris where
I danced only in corps de ballet. While here I did the title
role in " Romeo and Juliet ". I found the tour really
exhausting and it was so due to a very tough schedule. I danced
all the productions in corps every evening and matinee (we
call them "doubles "). There was only one time when
I got a chance to see London when " Romeo " went
with the second cast. So I didn’t have to dance and between
the performances I could afford a short walk around the city
(though I had to return to the evening performance as I was
in reserve). We worked without a day off.
In the morning before each new run of
ballets there was an obligatory dress rehearsal, and in the
evening there was a performance for the public, so the performance
was really "doubled". As it was explained to us,
these morning “rehearsals” were arranged for the press, photographers
and TV, for them to see and shoot the ballet beforehand in
no haste and hurry. Their presence meant we were to dance
a full-fledged performance in " full force ", with
our make-up and costumes on. A matinee and this sort of "double"
differed only in time: “doubles” began at midday, while matinees
started at two a.m. and left us with no time for rest. During
the breaks between the "doubles" we didn’t take
off our make-up and costumes, neither we left the theatre.
After the “rehearsal” we could have a little rest before the
evening performance. Doubled “Spartavus”, the most difficult
performance for male corps de ballet, turned out especially
exhausting for me. So there was practically no time for a
detailed survey of London, and in our only day off we all
slept it off to recover our physical condition. We felt it
was physically beyond us to go anywhere sightseeing. But all
the same I managed to visit the National Gallery, the Tower
of London, to walk a little around the city centre, to see
the famous Tower Bridge (I saw the bridge being parted), take
a ride on Megawheel which was not very far from our hotel,
to see Big Ben, situated nearby, too.
The weather all the time remained perfect,
it was sunny (except for one little rain), and our girls,
who got on foot from the hotel to the theatre wearing shorts
and slippers, got a bit tanned due to their daily "walks”.
The main nuisance were our hotel rooms: “small” is not the
word, they were tiny, uncomfortable and awfully stuffy though
it was a 4-star hotel. Perhaps, it was a 4-star one due to
its location in the centre of London, not because of its being
comfortable. In my room, for example, the windows looked on
the inside, completely closed hotel yard and consequently
even with the windows open I could hardly breathe. It was
stifling hot in the room and, just imagine, no air conditioning
at all!
This problem made my room absolutely
unfit to have an afternoon rest in and within breaks between
performances I went to the park in the nearest neighbourhood
which happily turned out to be just the right place to do
it. Like in all the English parks it’s quite all right to
come and lie down on the grass, wherever you want. With its
fresh air, green trees and grass, its beauty, tame squirrels
running, the park was much more restful than the hotel room.
I happened to fall asleep there once, there, right on the
grass, so exhausted I felt.
Our hotel breakfasts were our second
problem, being unfortunately far from various: we had to do
with fried eggs, coffee, ham and cheese every morning. These
breakfasts got me sick and tired in three days, and we couldn’t
think of having such breakfast every day during three weeks:
we had to go shopping for some food in the evening when performances
were over – we bought fruits, meat, and then made sandwiches
to have a substantial breakfast. We had dinner at the theatre:
we were given three two-pound food stamps per day, but these
stamps were not enough so we had to pay our own money to get
enough food. Supper was at our own expense. In the evening
we were starving and after we had danced a ballet we had to
hurry to the shops (which close early) to buy something nourishing...
Our tour was going on well, especially
in the beginning, when all of us had enough energy. But by
the end of season there was no energy left. We got so tired
that this weariness started showing, which couldn’t help slightly
affecting the performances. Therefore Ratmansky turned up
in the morning class and asked us to pull ourselves together
by all means. And we already were complete wrecks, did not
feel our legs and arms, and we were at the end of our wits,
too, working under such enormous pressure! But then we summoned
up all the energy left and we did it! We won the audience,
none of our performances went wrong with the public. In the
finale they clapped and shouted "Bravo"!
Only after the first act of "Romeo"
the spectators were silent, there was a little pause before
the audience started to applaud. That pause naturally made
us puzzled and a bit nervous over it as we were used to our
audience applauding at that moment.
When the second act began we still felt
nervous and far from being in tune with the people in the
hall. Yet when it came to a close they burst into clapping;
they were applauding with a lot of them on their feet, calling
us again and again, even throwing bunches of flowers onto
the stage, which fell completely out of their habit as we
were told. And tellingly, it was the first night of "Romeo"
when flowers were thrown onto stage. No one was whistling,
no one was booing. And we were surprised to learn that the
staging for some reason had got sharply negative reviews from
the critics so the ballet turned out to be damned by the critics
and adored by the spectators. In one of the reviews, by the
way, an odd thing was referred to me: " …this Romeo running
around the stage, as a salmon on a barbecue… ". Certainly,
everyone has got his own opinion, but we were first of all
guided by the audience’s reaction. And they obviously felt
sympathetic both with our dancing and the whole piece. It
grabbed them. They were watching it with an open mind and
didn’t even try to hide their sensation and strain. There
was no one in the hall carelessly sitting back and relaxing
against the back of his armchair. For the audience it was
no entertainment at all.
However, “Spartacus” was the most applauded
and triumphant ballet of the four. " The Pharaoh’s Daughter
" nicely placed at the end of the tour was also received
very warmly. As for " Swan Lake ", it gained a bit
less applause, probably, for the simple reason that it followed
the cheerful, boisterous and sparkling " Don Quixote
". The revised staging took the British spectators some
time and effort to appreciate. Every our soloist got his or
her equal share of success, as there were no obvious favourites
with the public – every participant was appreciated with utmost
benevolence.
|
| |
|
|
|